The Monty Hall Problem of Hearthstone Read: http://tl.gd/n_1sr04bf
Show this thread
I hate myself for tweeting this, but the whole theory is so interesting that it wouldn't let me sleep
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
It's impossible to come to an agreement with someone at your level of naivety. I was trying to help you but you continue making a fool of yourself. Anyway, good luck at breaking the meta with your stupid quest-mulligan plan, I'm sure you will be the next GM
End of conversation
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I wrote the exact same thing. Proof that you actually didn't read it and you're just being toxic
End of conversation
-
-
-
1 000 000 iq post
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I feel like I'm missing something here, surely there are two types of cards in your deck, those that you keep in Mulligan and those you throw away, and every Mulligan slot gives you two chances to draw a 'keep card'. Playing quest makes one of your slots half as likely to do this
-
Yes playing the quest lowers your chance to find a particular card from your deck by 1/30. Think of it this way: you rate the cards in your deck from most 30 (most powerful/useful) to 1 (least powerful). Then replace the card you rate a 1 by the quest. Then by always mulliganing
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
“Play cavern below in 2017” you re a man of culture as well
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.