I hate myself for tweeting this, but the whole theory is so interesting that it wouldn't let me sleep
Show this thread
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A good way of explaining it in simple terms: Imagine if Hearthstone only gave you 1 card in the mulligan. Would having the quest in your mulligan every game help or hurt you?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Perfect tweet to start the day with
#wennderhanneszuvielnachdenkt -
Ich vermisse dich mahbooby <3
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Deck thinning is what happens when your deck gets thinner. In the mulligan, you do not reduce the size of your deck because you are shuffling something back, so you do not thin your deck. By that logic, the Quest looks more like a Worthless Imp than like a Novice Engineer. Duh
-
The idea is when you mulligan away the quest it CAN NOT come back, so you've eliminated it from the mulligan phase. Dumb.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
But if start with 3 cards in hand and replace all (including quest) you've seen 5 potentially useful cards. If you don't run quest and replace all cards you've seen 6 potentially useful cards. I think the math is clear that not running quest would let you find 1 card more often.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Are there people who actually believe that? Wow
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So, do we play 2 quests in wild?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is still incorrect, there is mathematically no added benefit to doing it. You are getting baited here. What this is forgetting is that Novice Engineer can be mulliganed away rather than always kept, same as every other card in hs. It isnt a monty hall problem.
-
I don't want to defend this stupid theory, but you might want to talk to
@alexander_kargl about it. His argumentation made atleast a bit sense to me but I might be completely wrong here - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.