Time for my periodic public callout of @UMG, who claimed this video, specifically the song starting at 13:43, an extremely clear-cut example of fair use, as the discussion is the lyrics of the claimed song. There's subtitles and everything.https://youtu.be/xU1ffHa47YY?t=823 …
-
-
-
You can’t reason with a boot licker my friend - even in this obvious situation in which Youtube siding with an illegal copyright violation causes Lindsay to be in breech of her agreement with her sponsor
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Hope they call you back bro

- 34 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Copyfraud under the DMCA is illegal. The fact that it's rarely prosecuted in court, and rarely enforced by YouTube, doesn't change that. And if you want to get in the weeds with YouTube's policy, shit policy doesn't exactly justify itself, especially when it encourages fraud.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No it's not. This is Youtube's internal copyright process. a) DMCA requires taking down the content, not putting ads on it. b) DMCA doesn't give you 30 days to review a counter claim, it gives you 10-14 days to *file a real lawsuit*.
-
I was very wrong in some instances. I apologize. You are absolutely correct on both accounts. I had to go hunt down the actual acts themselves and look at some cases.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Seriously, read up on the mountain of complaints Youtube's system has received. The amount of abuse is egregious & they get away with because they have a monopoly. It's gotten so bad there's an entire cottage industry of stealing revenue through the broken claims system.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.