"THE MEMO" reveals that the counterintelligence investigation of Trump's campaign was, in fact, launched as a result of the PAPADOPOULOS information - not the dossier. Game over.
MEMO summary: Foreigner working for DNC (STEELE) was fed information by foreigners (RUSSIANS) and he passed that information to a US Intelligence agency (FBI) and the media (YAHOO) then FBI used STEELE and YAHOO as basis to spy on an American (PAGE) >>>>>> THE DEEP STATE IS REAL
-
-
-
Except for that inconvenience little thing called congressional testimony by McCabe which acknowledged the FISA warrant would not have been issued without the existence of the dossier
-
'Sought' not 'issued'. Key difference.
-
Good catch - you’re right.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Riddle me this Batman, shouldn’t the FISA court judge be issuing bench warrants for those who submitted the known falsified documents?
-
And those involved in creating, funding, etc (
@HillaryClinton@SenJohnMcCain etc) should be charged under RICO
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
so it was the DNC colluding with the russians not trump
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
So Mueller is looking at the wrong end of the horse. The collusion is between
@HillaryClinton,#theDNC and the Russians.#LyingLiars#Crooks - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
So basically Hillary, obama, Comey, Yates, Rosenstein, Ohr, McCabe, Lynch, strolls, Page, all colluded with the Russians!!!!
@realDonaldTrump@DonaldJTrumpJrThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So Comey showed dossier to Trump as an example of fake stuff that might be out there (so Buzzfeed would report it) knowing this dossier had been used for FISA warrant to investigate his campaign months earlier. Could this be more messed up???
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The Fee Beacon, A CONSERVATIVE WEBSITE, funded the first half of the Steele Dossier. Curious that this vital fact was omitted from the memo and your tweet.https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/27/us/politics/trump-dossier-paul-singer.html …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Their is nothing in the Memo that can't be refuted. The Dossier isn't what is usually used to justify such a warrant, but it is enough for probable cause.
-
McCabe testified they wouldn't have even sought out the warrant without the dossier. Everyone keeps trying to say the dossier was *meaningless*, when obviously, according to McCabes testimony, it wasn't.
-
And the FBI and DOJ knew the dossier was largely unverified, and they used it anyways, while withholding the information from the FISA court that the dossier was funded by the DNC and HRC.
-
Actually, it was started as a project commissioned by the Washington Examiner, which Nunes omitted. The fact that it was done for very different principals tend to give it credibility.
-
I'm confused at what you're talking about here. The research on the Trump admin?
-
The Dossier started out as GOP Opo on Trump (Washingto Free Beacon, actually), then was deemed credibkle enough to be adopted by the DNC https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump%E2%80%93Russia_dossier …
-
Yeah I know about Free Beacon, you said Washington Examiner. Free Beacon debunked that any information used by them was used in the Steele dossier. Also Free Beacon was researching multiple Republican candidates, not just DJT.
-
But they were the original principal this was prepared for. That they were getting opo on multiple candidates (and not just a hit job on Trump) strengthens this.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.