-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Not in and of itself, but an exaggerated interest in promoting it, seeing it or performing it may be an indication of one.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In all males the gland is only exposed during high sexual arousal, so permanently have it exposed gives these circumcised gentilalia a permanent SEXUAL look. This makes me feel very ashamed in public baths and naturist beaches.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Without any fact people will prefer or like one way or another, what is a fact is that a circumcised one is not the natural one, most erogenous parts are removed decrementing pleasure and functionality, should not be done to unconsented minor.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 1 more reply
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 1 more reply
-
-
-
Ive always wondered if the push 4 circumcision in
had anything 2 w/ a sick obsession of altering boys genitals, permanently exposing the glans, w/ a goal of making them appear constantly AROUSED! Glans r the most private part on boys, MGM strips them of sexual rights&privacy.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In some ways I do believe it is. And in other ways I believe parents just accept what has been done all these years with out bothering to research why.Until people open their eyes about the topic and realize there is more to it,the more it keeps happening to these babies.Its sad
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.