We will take this study on in our next #FreeAssociations podcast to be released on January 30th @PopHealthEx @iddocgill @dthea1 @JAMA_currenthttps://twitter.com/JAMA_current/status/954322549063680000 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @ProfMattFox @PopHealthEx and
Can you discuss the ethics of circumcision for disease prevention?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @renee_m_johnson @PopHealthEx and
Interesting idea. We already taped this one but we could add it on to another one. But I'm not sure I'm educated enough. What are your thoughts?
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ProfMattFox @PopHealthEx and
I have concerns about the ethics of removing a body part a function for the purpose of disease prevention. It seems that it’s not consistent with the idea of bodily autonomy.
2 replies 4 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @renee_m_johnson @PopHealthEx and
Do you feel that way even if people are informed of the risks and benefits and are allowed to make the choice for themselves and it reduces their risk of HIV acquisition by 50%?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ProfMattFox @renee_m_johnson and
That "50%" was the relative reduction. The actual reduction was only 1.3%. The African RCT's were flawed, by biased researchers, and unethical.
#i2@profmattfox1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MutilationWatch @renee_m_johnson and
It is true that the absolute reduction was about 1.3%. But on a population level this is a large reduction. I disagree the RCTs were flawed.
7 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
nobody cares what YOU think about circumcision, buddy, because you're in full-blown denial. The world is intact and that burns your bullshit.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.