you can tap on 10 things or click on them. Now, would you like the list read out, item by item?
-
-
Replying to @benedictevans @MarcBodnick
eventually most building voice UIs won't be so unimaginative. why not "read me the few things i probably want"?
3 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
‘show me the photo my brother sent me’
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @benedictevans @MarcBodnick
do you ask your iPhone to print faxes?
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
I hope you didn’t mean to claim no-one will ever look at images in future.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @benedictevans @MarcBodnick
voice doesn't need to defy the laws of physics & support images to become a platform used by most people daily.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
that is not the same thing at all
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @benedictevans @MarcBodnick
ur claim was that "voice UIs are the future" is unlikely because of all the stuff u see or touch on your phone.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
i claim that is an irrelevant comparison because voice does not have to duplicate those things to be successful.
3 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
AR could be the future. Multitouch was. Voice is not.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
Benedict, I hear ya. Voice is audio augmented reality. Visual and auditory senses = important.
-
-
Replying to @BrianRoemmele @benedictevans
Natural is the future of interface. That means automatic (none), voice, gestures, text, and (later) neural.
2 replies 2 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @DanielMiessler @BrianRoemmele
Gestures and eye-tracking is the answer to your question,
@BenedictEvans.0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.