On a cold January day in 2014 Apple submitted patent 0150220931. One / 7 new ApplePay patents it changes everything. http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=7&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PG01&s1=%22Apple+inc%22.AS.&OS=AN/%22Apple+inc%22&RS=AN/%22Apple+inc%22 …
-
-
Replying to @BrianRoemmele
@BrianRoemmele Enjoy your commentary, but these aren't patents. They're patent applications, just became public. Don't "change everything".2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ronmartinez
@ronmartinez Ron, of course. They however will be granted and they will change everything. Faster then most would think.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BrianRoemmele
@BrianRoemmele How can you assume grant? You'd have to have analyzed decades of biometrics prior art. That workflow diagram pretty familiar.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ronmartinez
@ronmartinez Ron, great question. A few basis I use. The primary one is the inventors have 50 out of 50 grants with no mods.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BrianRoemmele
@BrianRoemmele Look, it's your TL. But calling these patents instead of apps + assuming grant undermines your better points.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ronmartinez
@ronmartinez Ron, I hear ya. It is my assumptive style. How I called ApplePay in 2008, 2011. The assumption of grant saved many businesses.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BrianRoemmele
@BrianRoemmele In any case, glad someone's keeping an eye on this stuff, Brian. Have a good one.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@ronmartinez Ron, thank you! Much appreciated. Your candor and directness is needed and useful.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.