On a cold January day in 2014 Apple submitted patent 0150220931. One / 7 new ApplePay patents it changes everything. http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=7&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PG01&s1=%22Apple+inc%22.AS.&OS=AN/%22Apple+inc%22&RS=AN/%22Apple+inc%22 …
-
-
Replying to @BrianRoemmele
@BrianRoemmele Enjoy your commentary, but these aren't patents. They're patent applications, just became public. Don't "change everything".2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ronmartinez
@BrianRoemmele May be 4-5 years to prosecute these and then they may be rejected or whittled down. Prior art may be a problem, etc.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ronmartinez
@ronmartinez Ron, I agree in most cases but Apple has 98.786% success in patent grants. Frankly same was said about my 2008 prediction.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BrianRoemmele
@BrianRoemmele Citation on that percentage? Also payments patents new turf for them. Well-worn territory, not unique new CE hardware.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ronmartinez
@ronmartinez Ron, apple has not had a single payment patent application not granted. There are over 150 since 2008.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BrianRoemmele
@BrianRoemmele Take your word for it. Tho (useless) patents can be designed for grant. Nonetheless, misreporting young apps as patents.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@ronmartinez Ron, thank you. I do get exuberant over this stuff. Off to the wood shed with me.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.