On a cold January day in 2014 Apple submitted patent 0150220931. One / 7 new ApplePay patents it changes everything. http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=7&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PG01&s1=%22Apple+inc%22.AS.&OS=AN/%22Apple+inc%22&RS=AN/%22Apple+inc%22 …
@ronmartinez Ron, great question. A few basis I use. The primary one is the inventors have 50 out of 50 grants with no mods.
-
-
@BrianRoemmele Look, it's your TL. But calling these patents instead of apps + assuming grant undermines your better points. -
@ronmartinez Ron, I hear ya. It is my assumptive style. How I called ApplePay in 2008, 2011. The assumption of grant saved many businesses. - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@BrianRoemmele Curious. What patent/USPTO analysis tool do you use, to know that the inventors have no failed or withdrawn applications?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.