@BrianRoemmele Will be curious to see UX--for recipients and senders. Those using networks' personal payments APIs have been clunky.
-
-
Replying to @jameswester
@jameswester James, I agree. So far it looks to have a wonderful UX and UE.pic.twitter.com/2CSlkTVrtx
1 reply 2 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BrianRoemmele
@BrianRoemmele It's the receiving part that has caused me problems. Those I send money to have a hard time or don't want to add debit info.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jameswester
@jameswester James, absolutely. What I saw in pre release was a simple two step process. It was intuitive and clear.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BrianRoemmele
@BrianRoemmele@jameswester UX: http://bankinnovation.net/2015/03/facebook-messenger-adds-payments-video/ …1 reply 2 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @hornblass
@hornblass@BrianRoemmele That's assuming recipient has added a card already? It's the adding of the account that I'd like to see.3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jameswester
@jameswester@BrianRoemmele Why is it such a great deal for both parties? The networks, I get -- but for FB?2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @hornblass
@hornblass@BrianRoemmele Why offer service (and probably eat fees)? P2P is big opportunity: puts provider at middle of personal finance.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jameswester
@jameswester@hornblass James, fully agree. We can see the impact to WeChat and Alipay. So many people logged on 24/7.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BrianRoemmele
@BrianRoemmele@jameswester Was thinking about SnapCash -- any traction there? Would be a comp.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
@hornblass @jameswester JJ, very low adoption and some bad PR on use cases 

!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.