Thanks Brian, but can you point to a specific paper that contradicts the Cook & Wilson 2010 result? The list you posted includes papers about tool use, bottlenose dolphins and horses in mongolia, but not obvious which are relevant to chimps vs. humans for this task. Thanks!
-
-
Odgovor korisnicima @jpillowtime @bradpwyble
Jonathan, thanks for asking. I think the researcher Tetsuro Matsuzawa, PhD, Distinguished Professor, Kyoto University Institute for Advanced Study, has some of this in english, quite a bit is in Japanese. I am very certain the professor would love to address your questions.
1 reply 2 proslijeđena tweeta 48 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
The contact page for the professor:https://www.matsuzawa.kyoto/cv/en/
1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 23 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @BrianRoemmele @jpillowtime
Thanks Brian. I've been in contact with Tetsuro through email about this and he wasn't able to answer our questions to my satisfaction (he said that for the chimps "no training is needed", which can't be true). If anyone has better luck, I'd like to hear it.
8 replies 2 proslijeđena tweeta 85 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @bradpwyble @BrianRoemmele
Likewise—thanks for the contact info,
@BrianRoemmele. However, your tweet said the 2010 study had been "discredited", which is a pretty strong statement. For such a claim it would be nice to be able to point to a specific reference, if you have one.1 proslijeđeni tweet 50 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
I’m much more worried that 1) Matsuzawa 2013 did NOT have this figure, but
@BrianRoemmele cites it as such. As far as I can tell it’s not by Matsuzawa 2) Matsuzawa 2013 does not at all advance a Wernicke/Broca replacement theory, but a prefrontal WM development discussionpic.twitter.com/Vy5TxM4fo4
0 proslijeđenih tweetova 22 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @analogist_net @jpillowtime i sljedećem broju korisnika:
After briefly skimming this any many others in the timeline, I get the idea that
@BrianRoemmele has a worrying pattern of making threads with author citations on claims the original scientific authors did not makepic.twitter.com/mYIa4GZVnS
1 proslijeđeni tweet 34 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa -
James, interesting assertions. It would be helpful@for you to cite the precise aspects of the above mentioned scientists that are inaccurate.
1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 6 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
The scientists are not inaccurate (though some are controversial), your claims are, and you've put their names on your own claims. Do you dispute this? Did Matsuzawa 2013 make this figure? Or did you make/find it elsewhere? Why did you put his name on it?pic.twitter.com/9eLgTx3xMu
0 proslijeđenih tweetova 6 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisnicima @analogist_net @BrianRoemmele i sljedećem broju korisnika:
My two cents, I played this game about ten times last week, it’s much more difficult than you think! While talking I could hardly get the first two numbers right, best score was 7/9 without anyone around after 10sec of memory formation.
0 proslijeđenih tweetova 3 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
Rosy, thank you. It is refreshing to hav an honest insight here. Much appreciated.
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.