This is interesting, but as far as I know, not actually true. The ability of monkeys to perform this task at seemingly superhuman levels is most likely a a practice effect. Humans do even better than monkeys given similar training. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.4.599 …https://twitter.com/BrianRoemmele/status/1213860120058220546 …
Brad, that paper was discredited by 30 years of research at this university. Here are some of the 1000s of studies—with “trained” humans. https://langint.pri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/ai/index.html
-
-
Can't see anything there that refutes the paper linked by Brad. It's a long list of publications though, so hard to be sure. Given the original claim seems to come from a 2007 paper, it's hard to understand how 30 years of research could "discredit" an even more recent response?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do you have a more specific link? For me, that goes to a massive list of pubs on everything from cooperation in dolphins to feral horses’ reactions to death.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Did you ask any one from the Deaf community to run the experiment?
-
The experiment integrates an abstract ordering with an acuity for special relations. Deaf people tend to outperform hearing people in these tasks. The semantic forms matter.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.