By the close of 2029 the computer, device and screen will disappear.
What is left is the situational and contextually intuitive AI that is primarily #VoiceFirst with ephemeral and as-needed video.
“Invisibility” will define the 2020s.
#CES2020
https://twitter.com/BrianRoemmele/status/1213680655571120135 …
-
-
Replying to @BrianRoemmele
I believe in the contextually relevant AI part, but I don't believe in screens disappearing. The visual system (reading) is a far faster method of acquiring information. Voice relatively sucks for computer system output, and different input than output in IO is often also weird.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @rainisto
Roppe, I hear ya, an experiment. Read this sentence. Ok now observation. What took place? A data conversion. To what? Listen. It is a—voice. You are hearing it right now, your silent inner—voice. Thus the question is, how are these mechanical conversions better? Go direct.
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @BrianRoemmele
Yes, voice not as in using the slow conventional spoken out loud auditory channel. By direct do you mean all the way up to brain interfaces?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @rainisto
Roope, indeed. Either method is fine. But it is the most effective and direct efficient method of human interface. It is far faster then the mechanical breakdown of words to one letter at a time finger movements. We humans will be liberated to finally use what we evolved for.
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @BrianRoemmele
Yes, I believe in this happening... Not sure when but still. Although, I also believe that the vast majority of information consumption will still be images / videos / visual content also in the future, and I don't see a path for that happening anywhere else than on a display.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @rainisto
Roope, indeed. It is not Voice Only. The visuals will be there but not as much as we think nor as much as this epoch. Why? Because it requires most of our throughput. You are not ambient with visual input or you rapidly lose data. It requires 96% of your attention.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BrianRoemmele
It requires attention - or it utilizes attention. Immersive content is the same thing as efficient content. To give a bad analogy, I don't think radio will make a comeback over TV. Whether this is the future we want vs. the future we deserve is a completely separate question.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @rainisto
Roope, I hear ya. Turn the sound off in TV and movies and observe how far it will get us ( and yes captions are silent voice in your head). The rise of podcasts are the modern rise of radio.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BrianRoemmele
Not sure about that analogy. Start playing a movie, turn off the display and observe how far it will get us.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Roope, Great question. With the sound off, you would lose a majority of most video content. However with just the sound on you could be a great overview of what is taking place in almost all circumstance. Have conducted this research for over 4 decades.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.