Have we achieved anti gravity in the lab?
-
-
I believe
@BrianRoemmele is suggesting just that lately, Deep1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @InquiringJosh @IWANTTOKNOW2019 and
Have you seen it for yourself Brian?
@BrianRoemmele1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Brian Roemmele Retweeted Brian Roemmele
Thanks for asking. Yes. I would say we all have in some form. We just may not know it yet. It has been around for quite a long time.https://twitter.com/BrianRoemmele/status/1191192342037794817?s=20 …
Brian Roemmele added,
Brian Roemmele @BrianRoemmeleMeet the G-Engines of 1956. Because of publicly available research it was assumed to be a career choice in this young engineers magazine. The work of the Gravity Research Foundation shows sustained levity and made demonstrations at MIT in 1954. Then it all sort of disappeared pic.twitter.com/oxmzRW7tMC3 replies 1 retweet 7 likes -
But I mean in a lab where you could scientifically verify this.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
I hear ya. It has been verified by current scientific theory since about 1910. It has been demonstrated in duplicated empirical research since the 1950s. It has been seen deployed for far longer. There are vetted patents. I have seen levity demonstrated in a few forms.
2 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @BrianRoemmele @Deepneuron and
To quote the man himself
@BrianRoemmele , BOOM!1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @InquiringJosh @BrianRoemmele and
Not really boom at all. Until the mainstream science world sees real evidence for AG, there is no reason to just take someone's words for it. But of course we can all believe whatever we want in this day and age ;)
3 replies 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @Deepneuron @BrianRoemmele and
Brian has earned his track record as far as I'm concerned. And he didn't do it in this subject. If you haven't been paying attention, you should start. He's also friends with Tom if that eases any concerns.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @InquiringJosh @BrianRoemmele and
I mean you ridicule Tom's theories don't you? So not sure why that suddenly increases credibility. I am aware of Brian's stellar track record. That doesnt mean one man is right and the entire scientific community is wrong. YMMV
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
A final word on this. I try to cure myself of the need to question the messenger. I look at the empirical data and find gratitude in the fact that someone had the fortitude to present it to an often hostile world. I seek out these folks and offer to listen—and try to understand.
-
-
Replying to @BrianRoemmele @Deepneuron and
We greatly appreciate it, Brian. You're one of the few experts who takes the time to respond, thank you for sharing what you can. You'll remain one of the few people I actively seek to read the tweets of.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @InquiringJosh @BrianRoemmele and
Deep also takes time to respond, I don't want to leave him out. He's one of the good ones, too
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes - 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.