Question. Exactly who do you consider an “armchair debunker?”
-
-
-
Nathan, healthy skepticism is vital to science. The empirical trail & duplicatable research is vital. The erroneous use of Occam’s Razor as a grudge weapon to vital research is why it is not public. Folks perhaps for noble reasons, self appoint to “debunk” before they understand.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"We are not in Kansas anymore, Toto" is the most fitting comment that comes to mind.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.