Brian, I will start cataloguing your predictions (which always are accurate) because I want to be able to say to people, "I knew Brian when..."
-
-
-
Teri, thank you sir! Some folks at a major university has a hyperlinked catalog of my prediction spanning back to 1996! They have some of my old Hypercard stacks and have granted me thus far, 98.2% success rate. They will publish it soon hopefully.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Is the nuance of voice sufficient to prevent spoofing? It seems that these neural/ml/ai developments are able to closely generate all forms of audio, video, image data at this point. What will make voice safe? And if it is safe, what happens when a sickness/injury changes it?
-
Jaime, great question! It will be both a technology issue solved (using confirming biometrics as one example) and laws that will require you to 100% own your voice with rights and very hard penalties (25 years) if it is spoofed. This combo will assure it as a leading ID system.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Very very true Brian The one thing I love about voice vs any other possible identifier, is that’s it the only one that can also reveal intent Facial recognition can never figure out what you want, but using your voice can. It’s 2 for 1!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
By 2035 your voice will be 1 of 3 unique identifiers for you used in many official and commerce situations.
You will own the unique (1 in 700 billion) voice biometric and sonic stream as a copyright/patent and will have substantial federal penalties if used without permission.