Good piece on Ive & Apple, but it’s really about *hardware* design, which is indeed about how to actually make these things. Much bigger questions for Apple going forward (and recently) concern *software* design, which Ive was never great at anyhow.https://mondaynote.com/apple-misunderstanding-design-and-jony-ives-role-ed90faa146a4 …
-
-
Replying to @johnolilly
During Steve’s reign, he wasn’t allowed to be involved w software, a point most people miss.
2 replies 2 retweets 27 likes -
Replying to @rabois
Was a good rule. Breaking it led to form over function imho
1 reply 2 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @johnolilly @rabois
This was also the era of stitched leather interfaces. Steve had great taste in hardware and terrible taste in software
2 replies 1 retweet 13 likes -
Replying to @benedictevans @johnolilly
Steve and Scott produced materially better software than the Tim/Johnny mess.
5 replies 1 retweet 32 likes
Keith, indeed! Fully agree. I would say the balance of success for the iPhone was on Scott and his design language and esthetic. Steve has as much said it. And this reaches beyond skeuomorphics.
3:18 PM - 7 Jul 2019
0 replies
0 retweets
3 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.