“Brian you will need ‘General AI’ and that is decades away before you can ‘know’ someone. So this idea of dialogues you have is foolish”—AI expert In a garage lab with a few Raspberry PIs I can know deep context and thereby deep dialogues will arise.https://twitter.com/BrianRoemmele/status/1106667349787054081 …
-
-
Replying to @BrianRoemmele
What was his/her definition for “know”? And would you have characterized it as anthropocentric?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @VirtueofValue
Thanks for asking! Indeed. In my research I have discovered that it is impossible not to anthropomorphize -ultimate- any device that talks to you. We are hard wired for this and it would take evolution a million years to shift. Thus it is so very important to make it foundational
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BrianRoemmele
Agreed, at least in terms of the difficulty to not project humaness, however defined, onto machines. Was s/he reacting to your modified jung framework?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Yes! This is it precisely. The Jungian + MBI + (X) is bidirectional allowing for real-time adjustments to the user’s paradigm and indicators. Thus it will be very hard to “get mad” at the system as it is what you need/want/expect. It is very powerful once you get used to it.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.