Thanks, Brian! I still don't understand. Are you claiming 10x compression of voice (SWS already does this and more for certain values of legibility) or are you making a different claim? I think you refer to multiplexing as holographic voice but again, I'm unclear.
-
-
-
Patrick, yes! This is it precisely. It is holographic in its nature and can increase the bandwidth beyond standard SWS and of course standard speech. It is a form of multiplexing.
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
What is the astounding part? As you know, SWS voice goes back to the 1970s, and using a bunch of sine waves to approximate any signal is quite popular so I must be missing something here! Thanks.
-
Patrick, thanks for asking. I feel that the new encoding technology I have achieved (not demonstrated here) can increase data density 10 sentences compressed into the sound of a sentence and also longer passages, over 300 pages of text per sitting. Also better sound.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.