#1 is clearer after the second time around
-
-
-
Jon, thank you! Indeed it should be. The implications if my theory is correct will be fascinating.
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Wow, I have so many questions like 1. Does your research take into account intonation in any way? (I have perfect pitch) 2. Have you tested languages other than English & how does it compare? (I’m guessing it makes no difference) 3. Is there any application for hard of hearing
-
Lana, Thank you! Great questions! 1) Yes. I can encode speech in music also! 2) All languages respond the same. Multi-lingual may need native. 3) Indeed, as a “touch” “sound” it may aid in “hearing”. I can duplicate sine-wave speech as haptics.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Lee, great question and points. Indeed. It is one reason I have made my work public. It is also why I have not released my site-wave sounds. The power to transmit this high data rate information must be considered ethically. But the positives are astounding.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
That’s neat. Teaching one’s brain to understand something that was previously not understandable. Giving shape to gibberish. Impressed you did it w/sound. Thinking you might have already pulled it off also adding touch
Turning recognition into a whole body experience -
Antoine, thank you sir! Brilliant observations! Indeed I have performed this with touch and with sent wirelessly to the body from a distance of a few 1000 feet with no device on the body. If I had more research dollars I can improve quality robustly.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Absolutely wild. How did you develop this encoding? Is it really higher-rate than normal speech? Can one learn to hear arbitrary words, or is it a Bayesian-priors story? It definitely has “quaila” the second time around.
-
Simon, thank you! These files are not my direct work. Over the last 10 years if have moved to more complex encoding whereby I can compress 10 sentences into the space of a single sentence. With up to 300 pages of contiguous text. Very high retention and mostly “subliminal”.
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.