Voice did not evolve stand-alone, only as part of the package: a human being. Thus an interface only as useful as it taps into the whole stack in a good balance.
-
-
-
IIya, I hear ya. Humans gave up a significant portion of the brain to Broca’s and Wernike’s area, if aphasia takes place we can no longer read or write and gesture. This the phonological loop. The gesture lead to speech and is important but not central.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This is such a great write up! Voice first was never about voice only. I believe a clear initial path of adoption for a true voice first experience will happen with multi modal eg in retail
-
Jon, thank you sir! I really appreciate it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Such an insightful read! It’s the next evolutionary step for technological advancement to take and this article has provided deep insight as to why that’s the case. Thank you Brian.
-
Thank you! I really appreciate it!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The current iteration of Alexa or Siri both extremely limited until they incorporate rest of natural interactions. Seehttps://link.medium.com/MvjIEZ36bT
-
IIya, indeed, fully agree. Not at all where this is heading. It is the command line age for
#VoiceFirst the stuff I am working on and others are level past this question/answer platform.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So... Alexa OS, is it about ”assistant” or ”augmentation”?
-
IIya, great question. Currently it is neither with a tilt to the assistant. There are no true
#VoiceFirst assistants in the market yet. Augmentation is a great path but none of the current companies fully understand the underpinnegs and thus miss the point.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.