By not taking my free #VoiceFirst advice, Google easily lost billions of dollars in sales of Google Home products.
Imagine my paid advice...
Flashback 2016:
“Siri, Alexa, Viv, Google?: Why Google needs to give a name (and personality) to Google Home”https://medium.com/@brianroemmele/why-didnt-google-choose-a-human-like-name-for-google-home-like-amazon-did-for-echo-naming-it-alexa-87872bb220b2 …
-
-
Replying to @BrianRoemmele
For once I’m not sure I agree... none of the “assistant” names (and the value of their name / personality is dubious IMHO) have the power of being a long established verb. It wouldn’t take much of a change in invocation to make “googling” a voice function.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @daviddlow
David, thank you! Great points. You know this is a tricky area since the use of speech and all of it’s emotional connections have changed the interface paradigm. You can experiment with mood and emotion with a significant other to see slight nuanced changes impact mood attitude.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
David, I need to write a book about how the important the merging of technology from the last 50 years and the human factors issues that are informed by psychology, philosophy, anthropology, sociology and perhaps theology impact the next 60 year of user interfaces.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.