The WaPo argument is that "Sandy-related" necessarily contradicts "pork", pork-filled being Cruz's first claim. 1/X
-
-
-
And they are wrong. They claim that $2M for Smithsonian was related to that storm. Also, if it takes 2 years to spend then not emergency.
-
They do make that claim & they source to a link making one argument itself w/ links to the others. & WaPo piece is only concerned w/ "pork".
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Me from 4 years ago on Sandy. Includes Excel workbook if you want to do your own analysis. http://gonzoecon.com/2013/01/the-hurricane-sandy-relief-bill-is-71-percent-pork-2/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@freedom3556@bdomenech@FDRLST please do not load the Harvey bill with anything besides aid for the victims!#texasstrongThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No wonder Christie liked it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And how much of that cited 'other agency' spending was NOT related to Sandy damage? I expect better of you.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.