@BrianHDarling 1. Just saw your interview on @chrislhayes and you kept saying that Reid blew up the filibuster. You looked foolish.
-
-
2. You repeated said that the Dems don't have the right to do so. Yes, they do. Until the rule change under Reid, filibustering a judge...
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jacktomalis @chrislhayes
Was not a rules change. Changed the interpretation of 60 to mean simple majority. Rules still say 60.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BrianHDarling @chrislhayes
Changing the definintion IS changing the rules: simple majority is a definition used across many fields. It means half plus one.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @jacktomalis @chrislhayes
There is a difference between changing the rules and using a precedent to ignore the rules.
10:34 AM - 4 Apr 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.