@BrianHDarling 1. Just saw your interview on @chrislhayes and you kept saying that Reid blew up the filibuster. You looked foolish.
-
-
1. Factually correct, perhaps, but you totally blew the underlying facts of the issue. You and other cons are upset Dems may filibuster.
-
2. You claim this is a breach of Senate rules brought on by Reid negating the filibuster for most judicial candidates, yet you refuse too
-
3. Acknowledge that (1) the republicans in the Senate are about to do the same thing Reid did and (2) they also filibustered more than
-
4. 100 Obama judicial nominees. Plus the wholy unprecedented act of refusing a hearing for a standing nominee, Merrick Garland.
-
5. Then you had the temerity to claim that what cons did to Garland was legitimate when it broke all precedent. You looked smug and foolish.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.