Kamikaze Evan http://fb.me/O8aXJjuL
- what was irrelevant + adverse info? And did you ever actually read my piece?
-
-
How many more times do I have to repeat my objections to your style of argument?
-
- How classify Wilson's original Tweet - conclusory argument or ad hominem?
-
Feel free to demand specifics from him, though he wasn't ad hominem.
-
- Using word "dumbassery" to describe piece seems, by definition, ad hominem.
-
By definition, it actually isn't, since the epithet was used "to describe piece." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
-
- Piece didn't write itself.
-
Oh my God. Who cares? There's a difference between "your piece is stupid," and "you are stupid." Latter is ad hominem.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Irrelevant: "You work for McMullin." Again, I read your piece. Not the point.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.