Kamikaze Evan http://fb.me/O8aXJjuL
-
-
BY POINTING YOU TO THIS, AMONG OTHER THINGS: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisoning_the_well …
-
- what was irrelevant + adverse info? And did you ever actually read my piece?
-
How many more times do I have to repeat my objections to your style of argument?
-
- How classify Wilson's original Tweet - conclusory argument or ad hominem?
-
Feel free to demand specifics from him, though he wasn't ad hominem.
-
- Using word "dumbassery" to describe piece seems, by definition, ad hominem.
-
By definition, it actually isn't, since the epithet was used "to describe piece." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
-
- Piece didn't write itself.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
TL;DR: You have to engage arguments. "You're on someone's payroll" not enough.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's called poisoning the well. Whether he's associated with McMullin has no bearing on the truth/accuracy of his position.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.