Let’s see if I understand: Author of a paper evaluating evidence on Ivermectin effectiveness can’t post that paper as it violates a TOS rule against assertions that #Ivermectin is effective because such assertions are unsupported by evidence.
Who do they think they’re fooling? twitter.com/IanHarper58/st
Conversation
Replying to
What #ivermectin #censors have failed to explain is >>
Beyond their belief in its ability to combat #COVID19 what motivation do all of these high level medical professionals have to otherwise support Ivermectin?
Conflicted by $$? 🚫
Other conflicts? 🚫
Stupid? 🚫
Then what?
1
Replying to
This is getting scary. This is far more insidious than the lab-leak gaslight--which is terrible in its own right. IVR/HCQ/Vax questioning is bare knuckled overt censorship and about control. This is a hill the Wokigarchy are willing to die on.
2
2
24
Show replies
That's the whole point. They don't know anything. So why are they acting as the scientific and moral authority on the matter. That is the message they convey to the public, rather than a position of not wanting it on their platform due to their own inexpertise in making judgments
1
11
Replying to
I've listened to you for a long time. I tend to agree Ivermectin evidence looks strong. Will doctors prescribe it?
Replying to
A lot of people unfortunately. It's been a sad realization over the course of this pandemic how violently opposed most people are to examining reality. You don't even need to verify/dispute the underlying facts to recognize authorities are lying and obfuscating at every turn.
5