That which produces great progress in evolutionary theory is inconsistent with building a strong academic carreer in any field. Result: 1. EvoPsych always disappoints. 2. The public has no incling of the insight, health and liberation that could be unlocked with good Darwinism.https://twitter.com/Barryakers6/status/1018938451813588992 …
-
I may be ignorant regarding "good Darwinism", but isn't Darwinism a true test of survival of the fittest? Only the best and strongest truly deserve to pass on their genetic code? If that is true, then it would be ok to kill off weaker specimans to prevent inferior genes. Right?
Glad you asked. No, this isn't what I meant at all. My point: a high quality understanding of Darwinism (as it applies to humans) would allow people to live vastly better. I also believe that once we understand what selection has built us for, we'll have no choice but to rebel.
-
-
Perfectly stated, Bret. Thank you. (Wish I could have had a class from you. It's an unexpected pleasure discovering and learning from your public speaking/writing.)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.