That which produces great progress in evolutionary theory is inconsistent with building a strong academic carreer in any field. Result: 1. EvoPsych always disappoints. 2. The public has no incling of the insight, health and liberation that could be unlocked with good Darwinism.https://twitter.com/Barryakers6/status/1018938451813588992 …
-
-
This sounds like a conversation that's worth having at greater length in a more conducive medium. I'm surprised you're so negative about ev psych, when to me, it's just mainstream evo theory applied to human behavioral adaptations.
-
Agree about the venue. Before we drop it, though, let's be clear about what I am saying. Evo Psych should be earthshattering: Evo Bio of Humans. But the field is "stuck", as most fields are. The synopsis of Buss's handbook could literaly have been written 20 years ago.
-
I'm *not* saying that Evo Psych is uniquely stuck, or that there's something wrong with the field's leaders. And I'm not exempting evolutionary biology. Perverse incentives in the academic system have caused a widespread failure.
-
From what I see here on Twitter there seems to be an over-emphasis on sex in evo-psych. Maybe getting past that would be useful.
-
Adaptations evolve to promote reproductive success, and sex is pretty important to that.
-
Yes it is! Wasn't trying to take a shot at you either, I know it is your field of expertise. But it seems like most stuff I see/hear from Evo psych along similar lines. I'd like to see all fields of psych embrace evo psych, because it's kinda ridiculous not to.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yes. Always a generation away. Now do Socialism.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.