I'm curious as well. I don't much like the word "regressive". The term is used *as* a subjective value judgement, but it claims some degree of objectivity for itself (based on the premise that "older = worse, newer = better").
I responded in a quote tweet. I only mean "regresive" in the sense of 'backward looking'. Nothing beyond that. It's not a general critique. A small percentage of Peterson's views look this way to me (e.g. traditional gender roles, which are unlikely to work in the present).
-
-
Got it: you mean it as synonymous with "likely to be no longer applicable". I'd like to see this point explored further in an IDW conversation. I have the "Lindy effect" in mind (as popularized by
@nntaleb), suggesting that age indicates long-term sustainability in the future.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.