Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Yeah I was bringing this up here and at this point I think it's unavoidable. One doesn't want to romanticize abhorrent stuff but at this point it's clear no amount of underlining the message will guarantee it gets throughhttps://twitter.com/PetreRaleigh/status/1462127531885277184?t=6BphJCWfGzwMkxbvS4PgSw&s=19 …
So the problem I have is we get these endless subversions of this model of masculinity but what they never come with is an alternative model of masculinity that is shown to be capable or effective or cool or to be imitated. I think that is the weakness of the subversion.
They almost implicitly offer this choice between the cool, effective but also toxic and frankly evil masculinity, but there's never a character outside of it who is ALSO effective and cool. At best you have Breaking Bad's Hank, not figuring out the obvious for season...
...after season and then being killed before he has the chance to actually, you know, bring down a drug kingpin. Instead, they hide in the cynicism of essentially positing that only evil, toxic men can really 'hack it' in such a difficult word (see also Thrones, Game of)
I don't think it's unusual for these shows to have *characters* who are positive masculine figures, it's just that they don't play as resonant in the same way because all our actual masculine archetypes are bad
In any case though I'm unwilling to insist that art offer positive alternatives anytime it wants to critique
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
