Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
And to be clear, the department absolutely wants to fill that slot permanently (though they'll likely need someone rather more senior than me) and even started a fund to try to fill the funding gap, but they're having to do it basically on their own; chances of success slim.
I suppose I should add, if you happen to have a ton of money and want to do good with it, you could fill that funding gap (here https://history.unc.edu/give/ scroll down) to keep UNC's ancient history program alive. (To be clear, again, there is a 0.0% chance they'd hire me for this)
so I've actually been wondering this for a while, given how hard and poor new people in Academia are AND given how the cost of education is rising all around, where is all that money is going.....student's have to pay so much for teachers to be paid so little and its not like
there are shareholders to hand profits to. So where is the money going, over paying adminstrators? New buildings?
We knew Talbert was nearing retirement when I was at UNC from 2007-2011. Never would I imaging that UNC would simply elect not to fill the position after he retired.
Of course undergrads love to take Roman history, it's not enrollments. And I don't think it's a general humanities apathy either. It's something more specific, in how justifications for the humanities have shifted in a way that heavily favors presentist scholarship.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
