Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Another related debate exists concerning whether or not any human conflict, including WWII, has ever truly been “limitless” or “total” in the way envisioned by some theorists. All of which is to say: while some may lead you to believe these are settled questions, they’re not.
Ironically, by these definitions, total war is not a new thing, but a very old thing. At least if you follow Gat, in theory most hunter-gatherer conflicts here would classify as total in all three definitions, just involving much smaller societies.
Couldn’t agree more! …at least by that definition.
Right, it's all about definitions. And pushing on the definitions is useful, but it is important not to mistake a definitional debate for a factual one.
In fact, probably most common in those societies, as there’s no political-economic benefit to incorporating the conquered of a rival extended kin group when they would consume as much as they produce
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
