Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
A lot of knightly warfare was also on foot. The horse provide operational mobility, recon ability, etc. Fighting from horseback kinda sucks if you're up against anything bettee than peasant levees.
Eh, yes and no? To be clear, if we're talking 'knightly warfare,' we're talking post-Carolingian period...the skills expected of 'knights' are predominantly (but not exclusively) about mounted combat. They expected to fight mounted far more often than not.
Well a lot of knightly warfare was burning the other side's villages....
True, but because you are raiding another military aristocrat's village, the chance of finding yourself in a 'small' engagement is meaningful. That engagement would also generally take place with both sides mounted.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
