Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
It is also important here not to confuse prestige objects/buildings/projects in the past with more common equivalents today. Comparing the McMansions of the top 5% today with the chateau's of the top .5% of yesterday is a category error.
Anyway, Roman engineers made all sorts of awful constructions. Roman insulae caught fire or collapsed all the time. Roman constructions vary wildly in quality and using cheap stone like tufa inside a shell of expensive stone like marble or travertine was common.
Trying really hard not to tweet that pic of the bomber with the bullet holes right now...
And other parts close to Rome are still used as city streets...
So just like today
So true. A friend of mine in England once bought a 300 year old house. Unfortunately it turned out to be structurally unsound and had to be knocked down before it collapsed by itself. Repeat on a larger scale, and we see why very few houses in England are 300 years old.
Ancient engineers were also incredibly inefficient (by modern standards) When using their building materials: Many of those structures we see today are still standing because they are massively overconstructed.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
