This week on the blog, I gush about Dune (2021)! More to the point, I talk about why I think the film is a faithful adaptation, but not a dogmatic one and also how the film brilliantly presents a post colonial reading of the (first part of the) book.https://acoup.blog/2021/11/05/miscellanea-reflections-on-the-sands-of-dune/ …
-
-
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @BretDevereaux
Important not to fetishize words like "colonial". Empires have existed for a very long time, and they still do -- ask a Uyghur or a Tibetan or a Mongol in Inner Mongolia. The Han started out in a restricted area of the Yellow River valley.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @Joatsimeon
Colonialism and Empire are not coextensive ideas and also I'm not sure why you think I am unaware that empire was never and is not now only a past-tense or European feature. I note exactly as much all over the blog.
3 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 4 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @BretDevereaux ja @Joatsimeon
Post-colonialism is still a useful descriptor for the viewpoints and modes of thinking which emerged through and out of the collapse of the modern European empires, an event which spawned a distinctive intellectual and cultural reaction.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @BretDevereaux
I'm familiar with it and have always though it was rather fatuous, a relic of thinking of history in terms of "stages" or "progress", the teleological fallacy. I see it as more of an endless recurrence with differences being mostly superficial.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @Joatsimeon
Profoundly disagree on differences being 'mostly superficial.' History does, as Thucydides suggests, reflect itself, but it does not repeat and there are major discontinuities in the ways humans survive (pre-agri, agri, industrial) which have massive impacts.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys
If all one has is a light dusting of history it is easy to miss this because nearly all of our history slots into that 'predominantly agricultural' period (the 'organic economy'), but non-agricultural societies work very differently, as do industrial ones.
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.