Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Other factor is that, IMO, a hard shell defense is actually the right choice when massively outnumbered. In 1915, for example, the German line would have completely collapsed had they tried to fight a defense in depth.
Oh, substantial disagreement there. Mao has this right: the weaker party needs to trade space for time and attrition. Prohibitive defenses are the luxury of a side that enjoys substantial overmatch.
Conventional warfare is very different from guerilla warfare, though. In particular, attrition is a percentile game. If you have insufficient firepower up front, then they are biting off much larger portions of your forces than you are attriting theirs.
The biggest factor here in modern warfare is that only a small percent of an attacking force can be brought to bear as long as the front holds. A BEF division on the Somme only has 16 platoons in the actual firing line and this can be matched by a regiment.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
