Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Hm. I recall generally that once your outer perimeter was breached, things tended to get hopeless fast as infected buildings generated new enemies. That generally forced me to rely on a rigid perimeter. I might have 'crumple' walls designed to lengthen the time enemies were...
...trapped in the killzone of my units and towers, but that was about it. I might keep old defensive lines as last resorts, but there was never a situation where my main battle position was well to the rear of my outer perimeter.
Huh, this is very near to the opposite of how I'd play. Generally I was expanding with militarized expansions, with a core of units doing the bulk of the damage and retreating as positions were overrun. It wasn't a big deal to lose a strictly military perimeter
I wouldn't generally be giving up civilian areas, that's a quick route to a death spiral, but I did feel like you needed to prepare to lose some defenses every big wave, and prepare to fight all the way to the core for the last day.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
