Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
That's not to say the They-Are-Billions style defense games are bad; they're not. I played TAB and it was fun. But it seems like the genre of fort/castle builders never simulated actual fort/castle design very well and now seem to be moving further away from basic principles.
Maybe I should add a primer on some of the principles of historical defense design to the to-do list for the blog at some point (though I'd probably keep it restricted to the European tradition for the sake of my sanity).
yes do it. I've been using your blog as a reference for my tabletop RPG's and this would be immensely useful (I would also settle for a reading list on the subject)
That would be amazing!
Please do! I would love to read that.
Please do! I would love to see something like that on the blog
I think that for tower defense games, defense in depth won’t make sense because losing a “ring” costs you something, but the attack costs your enemy nothing.
That doesn't necessarily apply when you have a diverse selection of enemies with different correct counters (or who may be worn down by long-cooldown tower abilities). Kingdom Rush has actually been getting more defense-in-depth friendly over time, so that's one exception.
@Roelkonijn dig as many ditches as possible :)
Absolutely. If you aren't sure you have dug enough ditches, it is because you haven't dug enough ditches. If you ARE sure you have dug enough ditches, it's because you're wrong.
Please do! I'd love to see an analysis on castles and forts in movies and pop culture. Which castles are poorly designed and which are just unrealistic?
And maybe a list of games that did it well? D-in-D in old stronghold was why i was playing them. Would love to find a new goto. I think the fundamental problem of game design for D-in-D are unsolvable though
1. The space it takes means a massive unbalance between them and the production side. So you need to massively reduce it but... people like it. 2. D-in-D makes it hard to read how well you are doing currently. Feedback on what you built is hard. you will only know at the end
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
