Speaking only for myself, I am not very good at making the reading central to the assessment scheme of the class, and students figure that out in no timehttps://twitter.com/CliffordSosis/status/1447424870556524545 …
-
Näytä tämä ketju
-
I actually don't have a textbook this semester (just primary source readings) because I was assigning one largely out of obligation and then ignoring it. An insult to students' intelligence and their wallets
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 3 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @PetreRaleigh
I use textbooks for my intro classes, but then for two of those classes the textbook I use was specifically written *for*that*class* so the textbook-to-lecture synergy is a lot stronger. It helps that I am broadly uncreative and have made only small adjustments to the courses.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @BretDevereaux
Yeah, a big part of my problem is that there are not really textbooks that I like for the main surveys I teach. You really want to mirror the textbook structure/framing if you want it to work and I'm generally not prepared to do that
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys
Yeah, for my ancient world survey I use the de Blois and van der Spek An Introduction to the Ancient World and there I find I have to work a bit more against the textbook than with it and it sucks.
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.