Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
It seems to me that some decisions are - and have to be - about money and it is better to admit it and say, "we did this unfortunate thing because to do otherwise would be financially ruinous for our organization" than to claim some higher principle.
"This sucks but we couldn't have foreseen it and we do not now have any real choice about it that isn't ruinous" is a valid position. But you have to actually take that position.
Nah not moving the meeting for partisan reasons is just a different “higher principle”. Sure, I know some disagree with this, but with all due respect, a lot of mainstream academics struggle with the idea that there might be individuals with different first principles than theirs
The problem is that too many people think money is just condensed evil, and get weird when you try to worry about it.
Yes sir.
Yes, but when it’s money, there are usually other non-ruinous choices possible … that happen to involve substantial cuts to the executives and managerial class who would be in a position to say this.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
