Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Self-designed ships also throw the balance quite a bit. I ended up designing everything in my starting fleet, building around planned task-forces with set top-speeds for specific tasks and keeping weight and fuel consumption low and it made everything a lot easier.
It's more than a little awkward that your flagship is absolutely terribly designed for what you need to be doing and the smart play is to either immediately rip almost everything off of it or else custom design a new one (and edit its file to give it the flagship tag)
It's like a lot of realistic games. The immersive thing is that all the in-game ships make perfect sense as designed in universe. The Sevastopol is pretty much a perfect core of a battle group. The problem is that the game deviates from the logic of in the in-game world.
This game screams out to be a turn based/RTWP game in the tactical layer, the problem is it's instead a physics heavy arcade game with a strategic layer that is insanely punishing of any real mistakes/attrition.
The big frustrating thing about the flagship is that it's a battlestar... which from a game design standpoint it kind of needs to be, because you can't trust the player to actually remember to pick the right things. Also, it's narratively cool, which is why we see them so much.
But, like, if you were to actually make a flagship with all that electronics and fuel ... and missile tubes, for that matter, that's a fleet support ship. Potentially put a flight deck on it, too, but don't do battleship guns!
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
