They assumed that because it was true in the job market they remembered. But that job market is dead. Super dead. Cadaverrific. 6/25
-
Näytä tämä ketju
-
The other comment I've seen is the assumption that, on a year-to-year comparison that the bad years now aren't that much worse than the bad years then or that 2021 isn't meaningfully worse than 2012 was. 7/25
1 vastaus 1 uudelleentwiittaus 3 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
The issue with that is that this is a stocks-and-flows problem. Each year that the number of new PhDs is much higher than the number of jobs, the job market is essentially picking up job-debt, because those PhDs do not go away or poof out of existence. 8/25
1 vastaus 1 uudelleentwiittaus 8 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Some handful of them, each year, give up and do something else. Of the people I know in that category, very few of them are happy about it. Universities and sometimes departments like to say nice things about alt-ac, but fairly few people in alt-ac WANT to be. 9/25
1 vastaus 2 uudelleentwiittausta 5 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
It's not *none* mind you, some people thrive in alt-ac jobs...but there's a lot of bitterness and broken dreams in alt-ac too, especially since many supposedly alt-ac jobs don't even remotely require a PhD. They're not alt-ac jobs, they're just jobs. 10/25
2 vastausta 1 uudelleentwiittaus 9 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @BretDevereaux
I missed whatever Discourse spawned this, but I find the idea that PhD programs should prepare students for alt-ac jobs very frustrating. A PhD is meant to prepare you for an academic career. It's vocational training.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @cwjones89 ja @BretDevereaux
If someone decides they can't or don't want to be a plumber halfway through plumbing school, no one tells them to finish and look for "alt-plumbing" jobs and then fault the community college for not providing sufficient alt-plumbing options. They just quit and do something else.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @cwjones89 ja @BretDevereaux
The difference, I suppose, is that success in academia is tied up with personal identity in ways that other jobs aren't.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @cwjones89
I think the difference is actually that departments with graduate programs need graduate students to run their courses, so they have to come up with excuses as to why they should continue to admit large numbers of graduate students even when there are no jobs for them.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @BretDevereaux
The other half of the equation, for sure.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä
To be clear, I don't necessarily think that this is thought about in such a Machiavellian fashion. More that believing in alt-ac lets faculty/admin imagine they are not sitting atop a giant system of academic exploitation, which is comforting, but also a lie.
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.