I'd argue that WWII Japan is the trickiest example - it is clearly the closest that strategic airpower ever got to winning a war. The more one-sided example is actually the air-war in Europe.
Esp. since the Japanese leadership could not know how many atomic bombs were available. They had (nonsense) interrogation reports suggesting there might be a hundred ready to go. If you believed that, it was a pretty major change in one's assessment.
-
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
Strong disagree that IJN/IJA leadership retained a rational assessment of the war and its possible outcomes. A lot of this was face-saving and blame-shifting. The Navy and the Army barely cooperated with each other. A lot depended on personal factors outside of IR-rationalism.
Keskustelun loppu
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.