Tell me without telling me that your high school did not reach any world history outside of Europe.https://twitter.com/EGirlMonetarism/status/1429818512521023488 …
-
Näytä tämä ketju
-
No judgement to OP, American education is not the students' fault. Anyway, here's an ancient Chinese battle with 450K on one side, 550K on the other, and casualties of 700K.https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Changping …
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 5 tykkäystäNäytä tämä ketju -
Vastauksena käyttäjälle @JennieTetreault
This seems extremely likely to be hyperbole, much like claims of a million Persians at Thermopylae. I think the logistics alone here are implausible. Though I might be wrong or misapplying this post by
@BretDevereaux:https://acoup.blog/2019/10/04/collections-the-preposterous-logistics-of-the-loot-train-battle-game-of-thrones-s7e4/ …1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @PersistentSeekr ja @BretDevereaux
Chinese organization was different than European, in that feeding soldiers was easier because of the wide geographic dispersement of settlements and their higher population. But even if they're fudging the numbers by a factor of 4, that's still a shit ton of casualties.
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @JennieTetreault ja @BretDevereaux
Good point about the disanalogy
1 vastaus 0 uudelleentwiittausta 1 tykkäys -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @PersistentSeekr ja @BretDevereaux
Chinese military history is interesting in that they're using tech that is unknown in Europe for a while, their population is way higher, and most of their wars are technically civil wars. A good analogy is the big Greek battles, if you had a higher pop and less ocean.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 0 tykkäystä -
Vastauksena käyttäjille @JennieTetreault ja @PersistentSeekr
A fair bit of the impact here is also rice cultivation and irrigated river valleys (also cultivating wheat in N. China) which leads to very high population densities. Note in the linked bit how the key limit is population density.
2 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystä
I wouldn't necessarily say the difference - as far as I can tell - is technology per se, so much as patterns of agriculture. My sense of the research is that wheat yields in N. China were not dissimilar from contemporary yields in Europe or Mesopotamia.
-
-
But most agriculture in Europe is rainfall agriculture and areas of river-irrigation agriculture are fairly small. The Yangtze and Yellow rivers are *huge* by comparison. Like, the Yangtze discharges 30,000m3/s compared to the Nile's c. 3,000m3/s.
0 vastausta 0 uudelleentwiittausta 2 tykkäystäKiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.