May I suggest that it always is; the difference is that right now, we're noticing.
It's odd how the narrative is always that USA has credibility problems, when it seems like it should be that the USA has 'wild overreaction problems.' We may not be the calm hand on the ship of geo-politics, but we are your mentally unstable nuclear-armed neighbor. Just sayin'https://twitter.com/DavidLarter/status/1428362258778771463 …
-
-
Tämä twiitti ei ole saatavilla.
-
-
-
-
The shoe fits. (Speaking as a Canadian.)
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
What this country needs is a short victorious war to avert a crisis of masculinity?
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
pretty awesome in retrospect how even at the time, a common publicly stated rationale for the Afghanistan invasion was just wanting to see some shit get blown up as post-9/11 emotional catharsis hence why we rejected the Taliban's offer to turn bin Laden over to us in chains
-
and the people who push this kind of shit most aggressively will then turn around and say things like "facts don't care about your feelings" and "triggered much?"
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Probably a useful reputation to have
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
I'm fine with Russia and China thinking the US might vastly overreact if they invade something Mad man doctrine is good
-
If you want to see an example of how well madman foreign policy can work, look at North Korea. If you want to see why that's normally a state's last resort, look at North Korea.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.