Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
I think the constitution was a compromise and they recognized how imperfect it was even then. Just look at the bill of rights which didn’t come out of Philadelphia but represented the views of many who didn’t like the constitution at the time.
Oh sure, but just speaking from experience with ancient constitutions, even when the result of your ugly political process is a horrible kludge, it seems the temptation to then say, 'And should anyone alter so much as a letter of these words, let him be accursed forever.'
One advantage they had was they had the horrible example of the articles of confederation. The founding fathers had a more realistic view of the constitution than today’s originalists do.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
