Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
Although presumably Azar Gat would argue that it was in fact possible to win wars prior to the industrial revolution, when technological change pushed the costs of war above the returns?
As in, a king that goes to war might well end up with more wealth and peasants than he started with and could very much regard himself as having 'won' unambiguously, since he is better off as a result.
Yeah, again… case-by-case. Not an era thing.
Oh sure, mutual ruin was possible in antiquity. But I think there's an argument to be made that post-1900, war has become pretty much only about mitigating already bad situations. There is no way to actually 'profit' from war, because the destruction always outweighs gains.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
